Entity view
Who is missing?
Looks for another organization to add, and has nothing more to say when none appears.
Viewgroup · From Intent to FormationView 2 of 5
Counting participants is not the same as seeing what an outcome lacks.
Viewgraph6 frames
The familiar view
Roles in a regenerative network, listed the way software usually lists them.
In RSM these are contextual roles. One participant may play several, and a facility or a living system may contribute without being a participant at all.
The formation view
Requirements are set before anyone is named to fill them.
What must be possible at all.
How much is available, where and when.
What must be shown, and to whom.
Who may act, and on whose behalf.
Same list, still short
Some gaps appear only when capabilities are considered together.
Rendering diagram…
Nothing on the participant list is absent. The dashed lines are the missing conditions.
Two questions
The same shortfall, read two ways.
Readings
Entity view
Looks for another organization to add, and has nothing more to say when none appears.
Condition view
Names the missing condition and the dependencies behind it, whoever ends up supplying them.
Gap classes
Common classes in Wellzai's formation design. The list is meant to stay open.
Still open
Trust emerges from identity, authority, provenance, evidence, relationship history and observed behaviour.
The open question
If capability is the unit of reasoning, what is the right unit of trust?