Blocking
Cannot responsibly move
Without it, Wellzai cannot responsibly take the next useful action.
Viewgroup · From Intent to FormationView 1 of 5
What one sentence contains, and how much must be known before Wellzai acts on it.
Viewgraph7 frames
The sentence
"I want to transition 600 acres but need financing." A constructed scenario the specifications use as an illustration and as a semantic test oracle.
Rendering diagram…
Only the first two branches were said. The others are Wellzai's reading.
Epistemic status
An inferred or assumed value must never silently become a fact.
Four statuses
The person said it, and the words are preserved.
A reasonable reading of what was said, shown as a reading.
Taken as given to proceed, and open to correction.
Not known, and not filled in with a guess.
Unknowns
Each unknown is classed by what it does to the next useful move.
Three classes
Blocking
Without it, Wellzai cannot responsibly take the next useful action.
Decision-shaping
Wellzai can proceed, but the answer could change the search or the ranking. In the scenario: where and when.
Non-blocking
Not worth the person's time yet. In the scenario: the exact amount, unless it would sharpen the first search.
Inquiry
Where the network could answer it, the design has Wellzai look rather than ask.
Rendering diagram…
The answer re-runs the whole interpretation; it does not patch a field.
Stopping
Both failures are tested.
Asking after enough is known, repeating a question, or asking again because the answer was "I don't know."
Moving on while still blocked: searching generic financing when the person never said what it is for.
The sequence
The aim is sufficiency for the next step, not completeness.
Sequence
FromWhat was said
01
The expression is kept exactly as written.
02
Explicit, inferred, assumed, unknown.
03
Blocking, decision-shaping, non-blocking.
04
One consequential question, or evidence instead, then move.
ToThe next useful move
The criterion
Do we know enough to take the next useful action without introducing unacceptable ambiguity or risk?